Businesses are hesitant about adopting integrated reporting (IR) with the majority taking a “wait and see” approach, according to research from the Association of Chartered Certified Accountants (ACCA).
Chief financial officers and other senior finance professionals told ACCA that while they had yet to adopt IR many of them planned to do so in the near future.
Just 10 per cent said they had no intention of adopting the reporting model, which includes non-financial information.
The ACCA report, Understanding Investors: the Changing Corporate Perspective, which is the fourth and final part of a research series looking at the future of financial reporting, gauged the views of finance chiefs in UK and Ireland’s businesses. It revealed that some 40 per cent were actively taking steps to introduce IR in the next few years.
However, findings from a previous report in the series, which captured the views of the investor community, found that 93 per cent of investors expressed support for the concept of integrated reporting.
Ewan Willars, director of policy at ACCA, says: “On the face of it, what our research has shown is that when it comes to IR the finance profession is less enthusiastic about it than investors.
“However, CFOs are telling us that they do see the benefits of integrated reporting, not just presenting the company as an advocate of sustainability, but helping to align the company’s risks with its opportunities, adopt a more holistic view of the true drivers of corporate performance, and build better relationships with external stakeholders. Companies with an emphasis on longer-term investors are especially likely to see implementing integrated reporting as a priority.
“There is an element of seeing who pulls the IR trigger first amongst the finance professional community.”
ACCA also delved into the relationships between company and auditor as part of the research. Finance chiefs highlighted a good relationship with their auditors, but indicated there was room for improvement around high costs and a lack of competition in the audit market. Sixty per cent said they wanted to see lower fees, while 47 per cent favoured greater competition in the audit market.
Willars says: “Lower fees and greater competition were identified as areas where the audit market could improve, but that doesn’t give the full picture. Interviews with CFOs revealed that while they were keen to cut costs around audit, they made a link between price and quality. They absolutely do not want the quality of an audit to suffer if fees fall – and many fear that more frequent rotation of auditors may actually cause fees to increase.”